Post by kyu
CW: leather, death, grieving
—
I don’t know if this counts as a “fashion item,” per se, but the one piece of leather apparel which I can’t bring myself to give away and desperately wish were vegan is my grandmother’s jacket. She passed away unexpectedly in 2021, and though the pain has diminished, it isn’t gone.
This coat gives me a lot of conflicted feelings: there’s of course the sorrow, shame, and disgust of knowing that it only exists as a direct result of cows being brutally killed. Then there’s the grief that hits me like a wave when I realize that I’m parting with the familiar effects of someone I continue to love, but whom I will never meet again. I’m sure some people will consider this weak, hypocritical, and not vegan of me; all are welcome to form their own opinions.
Perhaps one day, I’ll be able to reach into my closet, say my final farewell, and #ditchleather for good (my boots, which are cropped out in this photo, are polyurethane and have been going strong for almost 5 years.) If anyone has had a similar experience with a non-vegan item of sentimental value/family heirloom, I’d love to hear from you, too. I realize this post doesn’t really address the #veganisnotscary Week 7 prompt, and I apologize for that — it’s more a confusing jumble of thoughts I’ve been turning over in my head for a while now.
10 likesReply
Veganism is divesting from animal exploitation when possible and practicable. That can absolutely look different for each of us but there should be no question when it comes to items that have been gifted or re-sold or simply kept from days past as there’s no additional harm occurring, and frankly, there is a valid argument for less harm in the fact that new items do not need to be produced. Of course everyone should do what is comfortable for them; if it feels uncomfortable to wear a second hand item w animal products then of course that person should avoid it. IMO if anyone is going to judge a vegan for having these types of items they are a not actually committed to liberation for all and are stuck in some purity non-sense that detracts from the real message and the work that needs to be done. 7 likesReply
Now, about wearing non-vegan stuff that one already has:
Advantage: it prevents us from buying a new item. Consumerisms is bad for everyone, including non-human animals.
Disadvantage: in this world where the dominant ideology consists on disregarding animals and treating them as mere disposable things, wearing non-vegan things reinforce this ideology to some extent. If this wasn't the context, I think it would be better to use those non-vegan items than buying new ones.
So there are advantages and disadvantages. I respect both choices.3 likesReply
I appreciate the detail in which you considered the advantages and disadvantages — I can see both sides and wouldn’t judge either decision. For me, reinforcing the ideology of exploitation and objectification is weighty concern. I wish there were some way to use the non-vegan items we have, while acknowledging and honoring the animals that were harmed… right now, I’m not sure such a path exists. 1 likeReply
I appreciated your whole message, but I’m especially grateful for the gentle reminder at the end! It’s easy to forget, but so important. 2 likesReply